<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who owns your portfolio?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/</link>
	<description>The website of a professional web developer based in South Wales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hywel Rh Vaughan &#187; Defend or Destroy?</title>
		<link>http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel Rh Vaughan &#187; Defend or Destroy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daibach.co.uk/wp/?p=853#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] policy entanglements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] policy entanglements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lacey</title>
		<link>http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daibach.co.uk/wp/?p=853#comment-51</guid>
		<description>This is a topic I&#039;ve been thinking about quite a lot as of late, I&#039;ve been a freelance web developer/designer for years but next year I&#039;ll be working for an agency for the first time and I&#039;ve been wondering what their views on this would be.

Whilst I feel it is completely fair to use the work you&#039;ve done to promote yourself, even when working for someone else; I&#039;m forever seeing freelancers and even agencies with very vague declarations of what it actually is they did: &quot;We&#039;ve worked with the BBC &amp; Microsoft&quot;, ok... doing what?, dropping the big names always impresses, but it&#039;s a bit misleading when you realise that it was a tiny subsidiary division of these companies that they in fact worked with.

An excellent example I can think of would be an agency I saw not too long ago who had claimed to work with the BBC, further investigation revealed that they had actually designed a flash game for one of the shows on CBeebies.

In summary I feel it is imperative for it to be made clear prior to a project is even began if the client desires the work to be excluded from all portfolios, but I am very against this when it causes no financial harm to the copyright owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a topic I&#8217;ve been thinking about quite a lot as of late, I&#8217;ve been a freelance web developer/designer for years but next year I&#8217;ll be working for an agency for the first time and I&#8217;ve been wondering what their views on this would be.</p>
<p>Whilst I feel it is completely fair to use the work you&#8217;ve done to promote yourself, even when working for someone else; I&#8217;m forever seeing freelancers and even agencies with very vague declarations of what it actually is they did: &#8220;We&#8217;ve worked with the BBC &amp; Microsoft&#8221;, ok&#8230; doing what?, dropping the big names always impresses, but it&#8217;s a bit misleading when you realise that it was a tiny subsidiary division of these companies that they in fact worked with.</p>
<p>An excellent example I can think of would be an agency I saw not too long ago who had claimed to work with the BBC, further investigation revealed that they had actually designed a flash game for one of the shows on CBeebies.</p>
<p>In summary I feel it is imperative for it to be made clear prior to a project is even began if the client desires the work to be excluded from all portfolios, but I am very against this when it causes no financial harm to the copyright owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmk</title>
		<link>http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>dmk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daibach.co.uk/wp/?p=853#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have issues w/ my portfolio at the moment, but I can see in the future that work I might be involved with as part of a company will be covered by whatever I sign on my contract. I&#039;d be interested to see how this is phrased in contracts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have issues w/ my portfolio at the moment, but I can see in the future that work I might be involved with as part of a company will be covered by whatever I sign on my contract. I&#8217;d be interested to see how this is phrased in contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daibach.co.uk/wp/?p=853#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Interesting question.  I would hope that designers/developers would be able to build their own portfolio and be supported by their employers to do so (and understand some employers would want a mention that this work for example was done whilst working at &quot;name of co.&quot; or similar).  I&#039;m not employed but freelance, and do state in my contract that screenshots/publicity may be used on my own sites of the work done for a client.  

Be interested to see how the conversation develops on this topic, especially from those that may have encountered issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question.  I would hope that designers/developers would be able to build their own portfolio and be supported by their employers to do so (and understand some employers would want a mention that this work for example was done whilst working at &#8220;name of co.&#8221; or similar).  I&#8217;m not employed but freelance, and do state in my contract that screenshots/publicity may be used on my own sites of the work done for a client.  </p>
<p>Be interested to see how the conversation develops on this topic, especially from those that may have encountered issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Carson</title>
		<link>http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daibach.co.uk/wp/?p=853#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Good question. I think it&#039;s good for designers/developers to build their on personal portfolio. I know Mike Kus, our designer, updates his portfolio regularly with work we do at Carsonified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I think it&#8217;s good for designers/developers to build their on personal portfolio. I know Mike Kus, our designer, updates his portfolio regularly with work we do at Carsonified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HRhV</title>
		<link>http://daibach.co.uk/2009/04/who-owns-your-portfolio/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>HRhV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daibach.co.uk/wp/?p=853#comment-46</guid>
		<description>it is a scary question really, especially when you consider the issue of fair use. how do you even quantify what usage is fair? the Shepard Fairey case over the Obama &#039;hope&#039; poster is the perfect example. perhaps the law needs to be clarified. surely a &#039;concept&#039; is owned entirely by the creator until it is implemented or copied...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a scary question really, especially when you consider the issue of fair use. how do you even quantify what usage is fair? the Shepard Fairey case over the Obama &#8216;hope&#8217; poster is the perfect example. perhaps the law needs to be clarified. surely a &#8216;concept&#8217; is owned entirely by the creator until it is implemented or copied&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

